As promised, here are the general election results for South
Shields since 1983, to give a flavour of how strong a Labour Seat it is. I
would have blogged earlier, but not in the greatest of health this week. (The
things I could blog about the Health Service!)
Year
|
LibDem
|
Labour
|
Conservative
|
UKIP
|
1983
|
22.7
|
46.5
|
30.9
|
|
1987
|
15.5
|
57.9
|
25.7
|
|
1992
|
12.8
|
59.8
|
27.4
|
|
1997
|
4
|
71.4
|
14.6
|
|
2001
|
16.8
|
63.2
|
16.9
|
2.3
|
2005
|
19.7
|
60.5
|
17.2
|
|
2010
|
14.2
|
52
|
21.6
|
As you can see, Labour has won the seat every time, with a
particularly good result in the year Tony Blair was voted in, 1997.
Interestingly though, after that, satisfaction with the Labour MP seems to have
declined by around 20%, quite a big drop, though how much is down to Bliar and
how much to Mr Miliband is a debateable point. I point out, not entirely
neutrally, that his nickname according to the South Shields bloggers, is Mr
Invisible.
1. How does this
compare to the local election results?
A reminder of how the parties did in the local elections in
2010 and 2012. A comparison of the results shows that the relative places of
the parties are pretty much the same, except for the independent figure, which
represents an amalgam of several candidates rather than just one - more
candidates stood locally, in the strong South Tyneside electoral tradition. The
pollster Nate Silver considers that local election results are more
representative of peoples' innermost convictions, so if the 2012 results are
any guide, this should be an interesting election. Certainly, the big parties do very slightly better in general elections, probably because of the popularity of the independents.
Party %
|
2010
|
2012
|
|
Local
|
Gen
Election
|
Local
|
|
Labour
|
48.7
|
52
|
59.4
|
Conservative
|
14.4
|
21.6
|
12.2
|
Lib Dem
|
7.2
|
14.2
|
0
|
BNP
|
8.5
|
6.5
|
4.9
|
Green
|
1.4
|
2.1
|
0.5
|
Independent
|
15.6
|
3.6
|
17.6
|
2. So what will
happen this time round?
Oh I love the fun questions. Well in 2012 Labour had 59.4%,
Conservatives 12.2 and LibDems didn't field candidates (but had 2.4% in 2011).
These are the most recent results for the area, but UKIP has only ever fielded
a candidate once in a national election in this area - they got 2.3% in 2001.
Here are the national predictions from the big polling companies:-
Poll
01/05/2013
|
UKIP
|
Con
|
Lab
|
LD
|
Other
|
Survation
|
24
|
29.5
|
20
|
16.5
|
4.4
|
Comres
|
22
|
31
|
24
|
12
|
|
YouGov
|
14
|
30
|
39
|
11
|
|
Average
|
20.0
|
30.2
|
27.7
|
13.2
|
4.4
|
A while ago, after Eastleigh, I played around with the
voting % and hypothesised how well UKIP would do in the Northeast:- http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=900837753505324236#editor/target=post;postID=1362365473363841570;onPublishedMenu=allposts;onClosedMenu=allposts;postNum=3;src=postname
This is the first chance I get to test my predictions
(bearing in mind this was back in March, and UKIPs support may even be higher
now. This is the fun bit of politics.
My slightly adjusted predictions for the South Shields by-election;-
PREDICTION 12/3/2013
|
Conservative
|
Labour
|
LibDem
|
Independent
|
UKIP
|
Green
|
BNP
|
12%
|
47%
|
7.8%
|
3.6%
|
17.8%
|
5.3%
|
6.5%
|
Dream result: Liberal Democrat of course, but if a guy
dressed as a monkey won, I can't help thinking Mr Monkey would be an improvement
on Mr Miliband...
Prediction:
ReplyDeleteConservatives - 9%
Lib Dems 3%
Independent/others 5%
UKIP - 30%
Labour -51%
BNP - 2%
Lib Dem vote could be as low as 2% - completely squeezed out in South Shields.
ReplyDeleteGiven reports coming in - and changing odds by bookies - UKIP may be as high as 35% of the vote, tories 6/7%, Labour 50%...
ReplyDelete